Best o’ the Bitch, Parenting, Pop Culture

Pink Guns & The Morning After

There’s been a lot of commotion and discussion over the horrible story of the 5-year- old Kentucky boy who accidentally shot and killed his 2-year-old sister last week with his own “My Little Rifle” miniature gun.

Yesterday I joined the fray and debated fellow mommy blogger, Trisha Haas (www.momdot.com), on CNN. If you missed it, check it out: http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2013/05/05/exp-guns-and-kids.cnn

My position, if you couldn’t exactly tell, was that the marketer of this gun, Keystone Sporting Arms, was not to blame for this horrific tragedy. The original guest, my friend and popular blogger, Jessica Gottlieb, would’ve argued this point brilliantly: she owns a gun, is a parent, and is also one of the brightest people I know. She is not buying pink guns for her daughter, but she is also not buying that the marketer is to blame in this horrific incident.

Neither do I, by the way. But I came from a different perspective: I don’t own a gun, but I am a marketing professional. And in my day I’ve had to market some pretty horrific products myself — like the time I had to put together a video box set of A&E programming for their #1 viewed Biography programs.

Serial Killers.

The set was to include fan favorites like John Wayne Gacy, Ted Bundy, and Jeffrey Dahmer. I know, that sounds more like a Lifetime “Television for Women” round-up, right? (And isn’t it weird that it does? Why is violent and tragic storytelling so appealing to women? Now that’s a question and a blog post for another day, my bitches.)

At the time I was putting together the marketing plan for this video set, I was pregnant. As I watched the shows, I felt my baby kick, and I worried about who the hell was buying this product. What kind of parent would purchase it, watch it, and display it proudly in their entertainment collection?

I was troubled, but I wasn’t the decider here. A gigantic wholesale club was standing by to order the stuff in bulk, and money talks. Plus the programming was on the air for free, and plenty of people were watching those shows in the privacy of their own homes.

That wasn’t my business anyway: selling product was.

Lucky for me, my conscious, and all of us frankly, the product never came to fruition. The execs at A&E pulled the plug, and the retailer had lost interest anyways.

If you haven’t see how “My Little Rifle” was marketed, you can check it out here on Mother Jones. They were one of the only media outlets smart enough to do screen grabs of the product that killed the little girl in Kentucky. (Note to journalists: don’t use live links to make your story: smart marketers will take down websites that showcase products that are under fire. Pun intended!)

I personally had no idea that there were companies out there that make and market guns for children. But you know what? I’m not their target audience.

But I am an American who values all of my constitutionally ensured freedoms, like Freedom of Speech (that’s the marketer’s lil’ darlin’), and amendments I’m less comfortable with — like the Right to Bear Arms — as these are all the law of the land.

So I say, let the marketers market. Lady Karma, the ultimate bitch, will always be there for the M.O.D. Squad (“Merchants of Death” — those who market cigarettes, booze, and firearms — a coin termed in the brilliant Christopher Buckley in his novel, Thank You For Smoking, and the movie by the same name).

And you, parents, BE THE PARENT! You brought your children into the world, now take good care that the future generation actually has a future.

If I could bottle and sell intelligence, I would. I’m imagining I’d make a fortune, but then again, maybe not everyone wants it. Ignorance is bliss, as they say.

Lord knows if intelligence were a bill, it would die in Congress.

In the same week the tragedy took place in Kentucky, there were many other incidents in this country where a child shot another child. They didn’t make national news because they didn’t have such a catchy hook as involving a gun marketed specifically to children.

But these incidents had one thing in common: they were all accidents. Preventable accidents.

And the aftermaths have everything in common. Devastated families, traumatized surviving children, and all around heartsick compassion for such unnecessary loss.

Plus lots and lots of media ruminations on the subject across all channels, from CNN to mommy blogs. I want to thank you all for indulging me for mine, and I hope that my point came through loud and clear.

For my new Bitch’in Suburbia readers, thanks for joining! Normally this is a once a week post, published on Fridays, for your reading pleasure and hopefully thoughtful digestion. Please read my earlier thoughts on guns, moms debating moms, marketers who should be shot (pun intended), and youth sports (which in my family doesn’t involve shooting guns). And much, much more!

See you back here on Friday!

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Post Next Post

13 Comments

  • Reply 1214133670 May 6, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    well done Trudi – thank you.

  • Reply Tamera Faulkner May 6, 2013 at 5:07 pm

    well done Trudi – thank you.

  • Reply 1414717853 May 6, 2013 at 5:26 pm

    Thanks Tam! XO

  • Reply Trudi Smith Roth May 6, 2013 at 5:26 pm

    Thanks Tam! XO

  • Reply Christine Talyancich May 6, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    Well done girl x.

  • Reply 566695241 May 6, 2013 at 10:12 pm

    Well done girl x.

  • Reply 1133595244 May 6, 2013 at 10:39 pm

    Loved the piece Trudi. You dominated the conversation. Reminds me of the last time we talked. :–))

    The point that parents are the ultimate people responsible for protecting our children and its not reasonable to blame the manufacturer for something that the parents could have easily prevented… is something with which I agree (though with may of the same reservations as you).

    Had someone told you years ago that in 2013 you would be arguing that gun manufacturers are not to blame for selling guns to kids if a kid losses their life from the perspective of a “mommy blogger… ” what would you have said in response?

    • Reply Trudi May 6, 2013 at 4:14 pm

      Thanks Lar – and if someone told me in 2013 I’d have to argue that gun manufacturers aren’t to blame for selling guns to kids if a kid loses their life as a mommy blogger, I’d say WTF are you talking about? Since when did ANYONE think it’s a good idea to sell guns to kids? (CORRECTION – sell “cute” real guns to adults that they then give to their child as a birthday gift.) But that would be common sense talking, something that our society clearly lacks these days.

  • Reply Larry Slade May 6, 2013 at 10:39 pm

    Loved the piece Trudi. You dominated the conversation. Reminds me of the last time we talked. :–))

    The point that parents are the ultimate people responsible for protecting our children and its not reasonable to blame the manufacturer for something that the parents could have easily prevented… is something with which I agree (though with may of the same reservations as you).

    Had someone told you years ago that in 2013 you would be arguing that gun manufacturers are not to blame for selling guns to kids if a kid losses their life from the perspective of a "mommy blogger… " what would you have said in response?

  • Reply 720657910 May 7, 2013 at 1:59 am

    You were so good and it was ridiculously fun for me to watch the two of you together.

  • Reply Jessica Wilzig Gottlieb May 7, 2013 at 1:59 am

    You were so good and it was ridiculously fun for me to watch the two of you together.

    • Reply Trudi Smith Roth May 7, 2013 at 2:01 am

      Thanks Jessica – it was really fun, which at 5:15 a.m. on a Sunday morning is not so easy to do. Owe it all to you! XO

  • Reply 720657910 May 7, 2013 at 1:59 am

    You were so good and it was ridiculously fun for me to watch the two of you together.

  • Leave a Reply